Snake venom can vary in a single species β and itβs not just about adaptation to their prey
This article by , and , is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .
The Mohave rattlesnake β poster child for venom variation among rattlesnakes.: image credit & copyright: Wolfgang WΓΌster Few sights and sounds are as emblematic of the North American southwest as a defensive rattlesnake, . The message is loud and clear, βBack off! If you donβt hurt me, I wonβt hurt you.β Any intruders who fail to heed the warning can expect to fall victim to a venomous bite.
But the consequences of that bite are surprisingly unpredictable. Snake venoms are complex cocktails made up of dozens of individual toxins that attack different parts of the targetβs body. The composition of these cocktails is highly variable, even within single species. Biologists have come to assume that most of this variation reflects adaptation to what prey the snakes eat in the wild. But of the Mohave rattlesnake (Crotalus scutulatus, also known as the Mojave rattlesnake) has uncovered an intriguing exception to this rule.
A 20-minute drive can take you from a population of this rattlesnake species with a highly lethal neurotoxic venom, , to one with a haemotoxic venom, causing . The neurotoxic venom (known as venom A) can be more than ten times as lethal as the haemotoxic venom (venom B), at least to lab mice.
The Mohave rattlesnake is not alone in having different venoms like this β several other rattlesnake species display the . But why do we see these differences? Snake venom evolved to subdue and kill prey. One venom may be better at killing one prey species, while another may be more toxic to different prey. Natural selection should favour different venoms in snakes eating different prey β itβs a classic example of evolution through natural selection.
This idea that snake venom varies due to adaptation to eating different prey has become among herpetologists and toxinologists. Some have found between venom and prey. Others have shown of venoms, or identified toxins . The venom of some snakes even .
We expected the Mohave rattlesnake to be a prime example of this phenomenon. The extreme differences in venom composition, toxicity and mode of action (whether it is neurotoxic or haemotoxic) seem an obvious target for natural selection for different prey. And yet, when we correlated differences in venom composition with regional diet, we were shocked to find there is no link.
Variable venoms
In the absence of adaptation to local diet, we expected to see gene flow (transfer of genetic material between populations) and venom composition. Populations with ample gene flow would be expected to have more similar venoms than populations that are genetically less connected. But once again, we drew a blank β there is no link between gene flow and venom. This finding, together with the geographic segregation of the two populations with different venoms, suggests that instead there is strong local selection for venom type.
Mohave rattlesnake feeding on a kangaroo rat, one of its most common prey items. : image credit & copyright: Wolfgang WΓΌster The next step in our research was to test for links between venom and the physical environment. Finally, we found some associations. The haemotoxic venom is found in rattlesnakes which live in an area which experiences warmer temperatures and more consistently low rainfall compared to where the rattlesnakes with the neurotoxic venom are found. But even this finding is deeply puzzling.
It has been suggested that, as well as killing prey, venom . Rattlesnakes eat large prey in one piece, and then have to digest it in a race against decay. A venom that starts predigesting the prey from the inside could help, especially in cooler climates where digestion is more difficult.
But the rattlesnakes with haemotoxic venom B, which better aids digestion, are found in warmer places, while snakes from cooler upland deserts invariably produce the non-digestive, neurotoxic venom A. Yet again, none of the conventional explanations make sense.
Clearly, the selective forces behind the extreme venom variation in the Mohave rattlesnake are complex and subtle. A link to diet may yet be found, perhaps through different kinds of in key prey species, or prey dynamics affected by local climate. In any case, our results reopen the discussion on the drivers of venom composition, and caution against the simplistic assumption that all venom variation is driven by the species composition of regional diets.
From a human perspective, variation in venom composition is the bane of anyone working on snakebite treatments, or antidote development. It can lead to unexpected symptoms, and against some populations of a species they supposedly cover. Anyone living within the range of the Mohave rattlesnake can rest easy though β the available antivenoms cover both main venom types.
Globally, however, our study underlines the unpredictability of venom variation, and shows again that there are no shortcuts to understanding it. Those developing antivenoms need to to ensure that their products are effective against all intended venoms.
, Senior Lecturer in Zoology, and , Associate Research Scientist,
Publication date: 21 March 2019